If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In safe distance from cell tower there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.